Petrophysical Techniques; Geology/Geophysics 449
Disclaimer: While every reasonable effort is made to ensure that the information provided is accurate, no guarantees for the currency or accuracy of information are made. It takes several proof readings and rewrites to bring the quiz to an exceptional level. If you find an error, please contact me as soon as possible. Please indicate the question ID-Number or description because server may randomize the questions and answers.
Questions on Petrophysical Log Interpretation will not appear in the following exam. Log questions are published under a separate section.
Go to: Midterm II | Well Log Interpretation
Geology (GLGY 449-UCAL) Midterm I
Congratulations - you have completed Geology (GLGY 449-UCAL) Midterm I.
You scored %%SCORE%% out of %%TOTAL%%.
Your performance has been rated as %%RATING%%
Question 1 |
A | The Na+ ion diffuse because Cl- attracts more water molecules. |
B | The Cl- ion diffuse because Na+ attracts more water molecules. |
C | The Na+ ion diffuse because it has a stronger charge (attraction) than Cl-. |
D | The Cl- ion diffuse because it is much smaller in size than Na+. |
E | The Cl- ion diffuse because it has a stronger charge (attraction) than Na+. |
F | The Na+ ion diffuse because it is much smaller in size than Cl-. |
Question 2 |
A | Increased rate of friction between clay particles due to overburden pressure. |
B | Lower porosity loss in clay sequence compared to sandstone and shale due to clay being very dry in nature. |
C | No porosity loss within shale sequence due to shale being already compacted by the time of burial. |
D | Rapid loss of porosity within the sandstone sequence due to sandstone having higher permeability. |
E | Lower rate of porosity loss within the shale sequence due to tightly packed ionic bonds in shale. |
Question 3 |
A | The invaded zone is larger in low porosity and permeability formations because slower flow result in slow build up of mudcake. |
B | The invaded zone is larger in high porosity and permeability formations because faster flow result in slow build up of mudcake. |
C | Larger invaded zones provides the best resolutions of LWD logs because it allow the waves/signals to be penetrated deep into the formation. |
D | The mid invasion is enhanced by the fast build up of mudcake. |
Question 4 |
A | To allow cutting to be transported to the surface. |
B | To increase the speed of the drilling by applying pressure to the drill bit. |
C | To balance the lithostatic pressure of the formation to prevent borehole collapses. |
D | To prevent mud filtrate from reaching inner parts of the formation of interest. |
E | To balance the hydrostatic pressure of the formation to prevent borehole collapses. |
Question 5 |
A | ~ 35% |
B | ~ 5% |
C | ~ 20% |
D | ~ 15% |
E | ~ 45% |
Question 6 |
A | Use larger boreholes and wider cutting tools. |
B | Use high pressured drilling mud. |
C | Use fracking to fracture the formations to increase permeability. |
D | Use horizontal drilling. |
Question 7 |
A | 10 - 40 cm |
B | 15 - 20 cm |
C | 25 - 35 cm |
D | 40 - 50 cm |
E | 0 - 10 cm |
Question 8 |
A | Higher radioactivity within the formation allowing gamma rays to interact with minerals within the formation. |
B | Higher formation fluid content allowing gamma rays to penetrate the formation. |
C | Higher formation density resulting more gamma rays being absorbed. |
D | Lower formation density resulting fewer gamma rays being absorbed. |
E | Higher formation porosity allowing more gamma rays to penetrate the formation. |
Question 9 |
A | In stable minerals such as phosphates. |
B | In radioactive natural deposits of uranium as a by product. |
C | Within clay minerals such as illite and smectite. |
D | Subsurface formation waters as trace substance. |
Question 10 |
A | As a difference between bulk and fluid density. |
B | As matrix density. |
C | As neutron density. |
D | As fluid density. |
E | As bulk density. |
Question 11 |
A | Very high density allowing gamma rays to bounce off from atom to atom deep into the formation. |
B | Formations that naturally produce very high rates of gamma rays hence allowing the artificial gamma rays to be amplified. |
C | Very low density where fewer gamma rays are absorbed hence increasing the propagation distance. |
D | Low radioactive formations hence less destructive interference. |
E | High radioactive formations hence with more constructive interference. |
Question 12 |
A | Gamma ray logs |
B | Caliper logs |
C | Spontaneous potential logs |
D | Neutron logs |
E | Density logs Hint: Nope, that's an indicator of porosity. |
Question 13 |
A | Improved cost efficiency (low cost). |
B | Improved logistics due to smaller equipment. |
C | Improved speeds of drilling. |
D | Improved drill bits. |
E | Improved logging tools. |
Question 14 |
A | 5 - 10 cm |
B | 20 - 30 cm |
C | 10 - 15 cm |
D | 60 - 70 cm |
E | 40 - 50 cm |
Question 15 |
A | In the electronics bay. |
B | In the logging equipment casing. |
C | Outside of the borehole; in the data collection truck. |
D | In the bottom hole assembly |
E | Inside the equipment pads. |
Question 16 |
A | ...a very high positive response. |
B | ...a very low negative response. |
C | ...a response close to the calibrated zero position. |
D | ...no response at all (at zero level). |
Question 17 |
A | 40 - 50 cm |
B | 0 - 10 cm |
C | 25 - 30 cm |
D | 30 - 35 cm |
E | 15 - 20 cm |
Question 18 |
A | Gamma rays travel faster than other rays. |
B | Gamma rays are more penetrative than the others. |
C | Gamma rays do not react with any chemical components in the natural world. |
D | Gamma rays produce a much higher energy difference that can be easily measurable by logging tools. |
E | Gamma rays are not naturally produced in the subsurface hence removes the uncertainty factor. |
Question 19 |
A | Fast mudcake buildup with very deep mud filtrate. |
B | It all depends on the type of mud used for the drilling process. |
C | Fast mudcake buildup with very shallow mud filtrate. |
D | Slow mudcake buildup with very deep mud filtrate. |
E | Slow mudcake buildup with very shallow mud filtrate. |
Question 20 |
Depth of Investigation: 15 -25 cm
Resolution: 50 cm
-Very high readings when shales or coals detected
A | Density log |
B | Gamma Ray or Special Gamma Ray long |
C | Spontaneous Potential log |
D | Caliper log |
E | Neutron log |
Question 21 |
A | high natural radiation levels |
B | gas effect |
C | gradual increase in density |
D | sudden increase in density |
Question 22 |
A | Porous formations filled with water. |
B | Porous formations filled with oil or gas. |
C | High vibrations caused by drilling tools. |
D | Fractures formed due to drilling itself (non-natural fractures). |
Question 23 |
A | Mudstone |
B | Clean sand |
C | Black shale |
D | Clean coal |
E | Carbonates |
F | Organic content poor shale |
Question 24 |
A | Neutron tools |
B | Density tools |
C | Gamma ray tools |
D | Spontaneous potential tools |
E | Caliper tools |
Question 25 |
A | Gamma ray logs |
B | Neutron logs |
C | Caliper logs |
D | Density logs |
E | Spontaneous potential logs |
F | Spectral gamma ray logs |
Question 26 |
A | 5 -10 cm |
B | 40 - 50 cm |
C | 20 - 30 cm |
D | 10 - 15 cm |
E | 60 - 70 cm |
Question 27 |
A | 20o to 30o Celsius per meter of depth. |
B | 15o to 50o Celsius per kilometer of depth. |
C | 15o to 25o Celsius per kilometer of depth. |
D | 30o to 50o Celsius per kilometer of depth. |
E | 30o to 50o Celsius per meter of depth. |
F | 20o to 30o Celsius per kilometer of depth. |
Question 28 |
A | Gamma ray bouncing effect |
B | Compton scattering |
C | Pair production |
D | Natural gamma rays |
E | Radioactive capture |
Question 29 |
A | ...the radiation omitted by inelastic collisions between the neutron and the formation nuclei. |
B | ...the radiation that was not absorbed by the formation. |
C | ...the radiation omitted by elastic collisions between the neutron and the formation nuclei. |
D | ...the neutron radiation omitted by the formation nuclei. |
Question 30 |
A | Thin mud film between the casing and the formation. |
B | Mudcake itself surrounding the borehole. |
C | Lithostatic pressure of the formation. |
D | Hydrostatic pressure of the formation. |
E | Lithostatic and hydrostatic pressure of the formation. |
Question 31 |
A | Calculate the bulk porosity of formation. |
B | Calculate the volume of shale to sand ratio. |
C | Identification of non-radioactive clays and dolostones. |
D | Primary depth control. |
E | Analysis of grain volumes and grain characteristics of formation. |
Question 32 |
A | Shale; |
B | Coal; |
C | Very thin formation; |
D | Highly non-radio active formation; |
E | Highly radioactive formation; |
Question 33 |
A | clean coal |
B | clean shale |
C | clean sandstones |
D | clean clay |
E | clean limestones |
Question 34 |
A | 29% |
B | 2.9% |
C | 3.0% |
D | 35% |
E | 34% |
porosity = (2.80 - 2.25) / (2.80 - 1.20) = 0.34 = 0.34%
Question 35 |
A | The Well-II most likely surrounded by a lithology that is very porous and permeable than Well-I; hence the faster mud flow resulted in a large invaded zone. |
B | The Well-I most likely surrounded by a lithology that is very porous and permeable than Well-II; hence faster mudcake build up have lead to smaller invaded zone. |
C | The Well-II most likley surrounded by a lithology that poor in porosity and permeability than Well-II; hence the faster mud flow resulted in a large invaded zone. |
D | The Well-I most likley surrounded by a lithology that poor in porosity and permeability than Well-II; hence faster mudcake build up have lead to smaller invaded zone. |
Question 36 |
A | ...the contrast between the nearby formations and the resolved formation is higher. |
B | ...the radioactivity of the formations are much higher. |
C | ...the distance between formations are lower. |
D | ...the porosity and permeability of formations are higher. |
E | ...the depth of investigation is much higher than expected hence increasing the vertical minimum bed resolution. |
Question 37 |
A | Fractures of cements and minerals. |
B | Dissolution of grains at the grain to grain contact boundaries. |
C | Dissolution of early diagenetic cements. |
D | Break up of mineral compounds causing in situ porosity. |
Question 38 |
A | About 2 years |
B | About a day |
C | About 15 minutes |
D | About 10 hours |
E | About 4 hours |
Question 39 |
(START) Dirty/used mud return to...
I. Distiller
II. Mud storage and settling tubs
III. Annulus spit out
IV. Desander
V. Shale shaker
VI. Mud pumps
A | II --> V --> I --> III --> VI --> V |
B | I --> III --> VI --> IV --> V --> II |
C | III --> V --> I --> II --> VI --> V |
D | I --> V --> IV --> II --> VI --> III |
E | I --> V --> VI --> II --> IV --> III |
F | V --> IV --> I --> II --> VI --> III |
Question 40 |
A | Water-based mud because it the most effective way to reduce the environmental impact. |
B | Oil-based mud because oils do not react with evaporates and the mud can be formulated to not to react with subsurface formations. |
C | Synthetic-based mud because the mud can be engineered to be inactive with the evaporate formations and reduce the environmental impact. |
D | All-oil based mud because it is the cheapest and can overcome the environmental cleanup costs. |
Question 41 |
A | As saline solutions. |
B | In the chemical structures of clay. |
C | As a part of hydrous minerals. |
D | As basic solutions. |
E | Within water molecules. |
Question 42 |
A | Fracture development |
B | Dissolution of early diagenetic cements |
C | Dissolution of cemented materials due to high temperature and pressure |
D | Organic activity |
E | Disintegration of minerals |
Question 43 |
A | It provides an overview of the lithological formations (for example, quartz from calcite). |
B | The density logs can be used to resolve extremely thin formations and transitional zones. |
C | The density can be used to calculate porosity of formations. |
D | It can help determine the type of drill bit to use to cut into the formations. |
E | A high log value of density indicates a very good reservoirs. |
Question 44 |
A | ~ 55 o C |
B | ~ 45 o C |
C | ~ 49 o C |
D | ~ 43 o C |
E | ~ 65 o C |
Question 45 |
A | It is that of the surface. |
B | It is that of the formation. |
C | It is dependent on what type of logging tool is used. |
D | It is that of the drilling mud. |
← |
List |
→ |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 |
| 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 |
| 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 |
| End |
Credits: Based on the excellent class notes provided by, Dr. Rudi Meyer during Fall 2014.
FAQ | Report an Error
If you are a company or an organization willing to donate copies of well logs, please contact me. I really appreciate your contributions.
| Type of tool |
DOI | Resolution | Used for… | Processes | Notes |
| Caliper | NA | NA | -Borehole size and shape |
Spring loaded arms |
2 arm = diameter 4 arm = shape, orientation |
| Gamma Ray |
10 – 15 cm | ~40 cm | -Lithology(vol. Shale/Sand often due to high K), geosteering, facies, depth control |
-Photoelectric effect (dom) -Compton scattering -Pair production -Scintillation counter + photomultiplier |
High (right kick): -Shale line -Organic content -K-Feldspars Low (left kick): -Clean sand -Carbonates -Clean coals |
| Spectral Gamma Ray |
-Radioactive anomalies -Clay types -Volume of shale(clay) |
-Same as GR, but much better/larger scintillator | |||
| Density & Photoelectric Factor |
< 10 cm | 11 – 40 cm | -Porosity, general lithology, min ids | ||
| Neutron | 15 – 25 cm | ~50 cm | -Fluid, porosity, density, cross-over gas effect -Meassures porosity; used for calulating density |
Hydrogen | High (left kick): -Shales and coals Low (right kick): -Gas breaing fm./rocks Use Dphi & Nphi chart *Decreased with increased permeability |
| Spontaneous Potential |
Depends | Depends | -Permeability(even small), lithology, facies, shale volume(not so much) |
Natural potential differences between fms. caused by: -Diffusion -Mambrane or shale potential |
Important: -Salinity of drilling fluid to fm. -Conductive drilling fluid -Constrasting permeability in adj. beds -Surface electrode(earth) No absolute scale(relatove +/-) Positive kick (relative): -Clean sand or sand stone, shaly sand Negative kick (relative): -Shale *Decreased with increased permeability |
